Brain Science

Why Not Everyone With Brain Plaque Gets Alzheimer’s Disease

ReviewedReviewed by Susan Clark

Back to ArticlesArticles
Why Not Everyone With Brain Plaque Gets Alzheimer’s Disease about undefined

For decades, scientists have chased one target in the battle against Alzheimer’s: the sticky brain plaques made of amyloid-beta. But what if this was never the real enemy? A groundbreaking study is turning everything we thought we knew upside down—suggesting it’s not the plaques that matter most, but what the brain loses before those plaques form. And the implications could revolutionize how we treat not just Alzheimer’s, but Parkinson’s disease too.

Key Takeaways

  • Plaques Aren’t the Villain: Many people with heavy plaque buildup show no cognitive decline, challenging old Alzheimer’s theories.

  • Loss of Soluble Amyloid Matters More: Depletion of healthy, soluble amyloid-beta—not plaque buildup—correlates with cognitive decline.

  • New Treatment Pathways Emerging: Boosting soluble amyloid and identifying its depletion triggers may transform how we treat neurodegenerative diseases.

Centenarians Have Alzheimer’s Plaques—But Perfect Memory. Why?  

 For more than 100 years the conventional wisdom has been that Alzheimer’s is caused by a buildup of amyloid-beta plaques in the brain. This belief has remained despite the fact that no drug which lowered these plaques has been able to dramatically slow the progression of the disease, much less cure it. This failure led Alberto Espay, professor of neurology at the University of Cincinnati (UC) and lead author of the new study, to say, “We’ve run into a dogma. And it is very hard to test new ideas when the overarching theme of funding is centered on the idea that removing amyloid must be the only way to go.” Professor Espay and his colleagues point to the fact that sizable numbers of people with a buildup of amyloid plaques have razor sharp memories. For instance, half of centenarians with no history of cognitive abnormalities have autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer’s pathology. In other words, their brains are riddled with amyloid-beta plaque! How can this be? Professor Espay and his research team believe plaques are simply a symptom of some other process happening in the brain. And they think they know what it is…

Soluble Amyloid Is The Key Factor 

The amyloid protein in its normal, healthy state is water-soluble and has many important functions in the brain. But, if the brain is attacked by a virus, toxin, nanoparticle, or if some biological or genetic process takes hold, the protein can mutate and transform into solid plaques. When this occurs, it causes healthy amyloid levels to shrink. The UC team believes this reduction of healthy amyloid is the real culprit behind the disease. This is supported by clinical trials, in which patients with reduced levels of soluble amyloid show worsening clinical outcomes. “I think this is probably the best proof that reducing the level of the soluble form of the protein can be toxic,” said Andrea Sturchio, another member of the UC team. “When done, patients have gotten worse.” This finding is also supported by the team’s own previous research, which discovered that people with high levels of soluble amyloid had normal cognitive function, whereas those with low levels had a greater likelihood of cognitive impairment. For their new research, published in the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease in September, they analyzed the amyloid levels in patients with mutations that predict an overexpression of amyloid plaques in the brain. Under orthodox thinking, this should make them more likely to develop Alzheimer’s. Let’s see if this was the case.

What Is Lost Is More Important Than What Is Gained 

The research team found that so long as levels of soluble amyloid stayed above a certain minimum threshold, the participants remained cognitively normal during the three-year follow up regardless of the number of amyloid plaques accumulating in the brain. Professor Espay put it this way: “It’s only too logical, if you are detached from the biases that we’ve created for too long, that a neurodegenerative process is caused by something we lose, amyloid-beta, rather than something we gain, amyloid plaques. Degeneration is a process of loss, and what we lose turns out to be much more important.” He suggests this theory could apply across other neurodegenerative diseases and improve our ability to treat them. For example, in Parkinson’s disease, a normal soluble protein in the brain called alpha-synuclein can aggregate into a deposit known as a Lewy body. Rather than Parkinson’s being caused by Lewy bodies aggregating in the brain, it’s more likely to be caused by decreasing levels of normal, soluble alpha-synuclein. The question remains as to why some people, such as the centenarians previously mentioned, can continue to generate soluble amyloid even as plaques grow, while others are unable to do so. The process by which healthy amyloid turns into plaques is not understood either, but Professor Espay is optimistic and hopes that in the future, there’ll be two approaches to treating neurodegenerative diseases.

From their research we can learn that:
  • Soluble amyloid-beta—not plaques—may be the true driver of Alzheimer’s disease, according to new research from the University of Cincinnati.

  •  Many cognitively sharp centenarians have significant plaque buildup, suggesting that plaques are not the primary cause of neurodegeneration.

  • Low levels of soluble amyloid correlate strongly with cognitive decline, while high levels support normal brain function—even in the presence of plaques.

  • Drugs that reduce plaques by depleting soluble amyloid may actually worsen symptoms, highlighting a major flaw in current treatment strategies.

  • This paradigm shift could lead to new treatments that focus on restoring healthy brain proteins and using precision medicine to tailor therapies for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s patients.

  •  

    Rescue Medicine Vs. Precision Medicine 

    The UC group is going to study whether increasing the levels of soluble amyloid-beta in the brain leads to a better outcome for Alzheimer’s patients. This is what he refers to as the rescue medicine approach. The second approach is precision medicine. This approach attempts to find the root cause of degenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease. It delves deeper to find the mechanism by which soluble amyloid becomes depleted. If this can be understood, then it will be possible to prevent it from transforming into plaques and prevent Alzheimer's disease altogether. Professor Espay said that precision medicine acknowledges that no two patients are alike, thereby providing more personalized treatments. The researchers are making progress in precision medicine through a project called the Cincinnati Cohort Biomarker Program, which divides neurodegenerative diseases by biological subtypes and then matches therapies based on the biomarkers to those most likely to benefit from them. “The Cincinnati Cohort Biomarker Program is dedicated to working toward deploying the first success in precision medicine in this decade,” Professor Espay said. “By recognizing biological, infectious, and toxic subtypes of Parkinson’s and Alzheimer's, we will have specific treatments that can slow the progression of those affected.”

    My Takeaway 

    We’ve long reported on the appearance of amyloid plaques in those people without Alzheimer’s disease. It’s exciting that researchers are finally making headway into understanding the underlying mechanisms behind these unusual discoveries with amyloid proteins. I too believe that all indications point to new and better treatment outcomes once the mystery is unraveled. I’ll keep you posted on any results of the new studies.

    Summary

    A new study challenges the long-held belief that amyloid plaques cause Alzheimer’s. Instead, researchers found that the loss of soluble amyloid-beta, a normally beneficial protein, may be the true cause of neurodegeneration. This shift in thinking could open the door to new treatments for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is the main finding of this study?

    That the loss of soluble amyloid-beta, not the buildup of amyloid plaques, is likely the real driver of Alzheimer’s disease.

    Why have plaque-removal drugs failed?

    Because they target a symptom (plaques), not the root cause—the depletion of healthy amyloid proteins in the brain.

    Can people have plaques and still have normal brain function?

    Yes. Many centenarians with plaque buildup remain cognitively sharp, supporting this new theory.

    How might this change Alzheimer’s treatment?

    Future treatments may focus on maintaining or restoring healthy amyloid protein levels rather than removing plaques.

    Does this apply to other diseases like Parkinson’s?

    Yes. A similar loss-of-function process involving alpha-synuclein may be key to Parkinson’s disease as well.

     
    1. https://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-alzheimers-disease/jad220808
    2. https://www.uc.edu/news/articles/2022/09/decreased-proteins-not-amyloid-plaques- tied-to-alzheimers.html 

    Keep Reading

    View All Articles

    Explore Keep Reading